4 Amendments of Bergur Løkke RASMUSSEN related to 2023/2501(RSP)
Amendment 6 #
Recital E
E. whereas, when examining the level of protection afforded by a third country, the Commission is obliged to assess the content of the rules applicable in that country deriving from its domestic law or its international commitments, as well as the practice designed to ensure compliance with those rules; Whereas, if the US does not enforce data protection regulation in line with the agreement and if a new US administration decides on new rules that compromise the protection of personal data of EU citizens, the Commission can suspend the adequacy when there is no longer equivalence;
Amendment 32 #
Paragraph 3
Amendment 52 #
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that the decisions of the Data Protection Review Court (‘DPRC’) will be classified and not made public or available to the complainant; points out that the DPRC is part of the executive branch and not the judiciary; points out that a complainant will be represented by a ‘special advocate’ designated by the DPRC, for whom there is no requirement of independence; points out that the redress process provided by the EO is based on secrecy and does not set up an obligation to notify the complainant that their personal data has been processed, thereby undermining their right to access or rectify their data; notes that the proposed redress process does not provide for an avenue for appeal in a federal court and therefore, among other things, does not provide any possibility for the complainant to claim damages; concludes that the DPRC does not meet the standards of independence and impartiality of Article 47 of the Charter;
Amendment 60 #
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that, while the US has provided for a new mechanism for remedy for issues related to public authorities’ access to data, the remedies available for commercial matters under the adequacy decision are insufficienteffective; notes that these issues are largely left to the discretion of companies, which can select alternative remedy avenues such as dispute resolution mechanisms or the use of companies’ privacy programmes;